Tag: Court

  • Court gives Coinbase the green light to delist Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC)

    Court gives Coinbase the green light to delist Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC)

    Court gives Coinbase the green light to delist Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC)
    • A US federal judge has allowed Coinbase to delist WBTC despite BiT Global’s objections.
    • Judge Martínez-Olguín denied BiT Global’s TRO, citing lack of evidence of harm.
    • Despite the delisting and Coinbase launching cbBTC, WBTC dominates the wrapped digital assets market with an 85% share.

    In a pivotal legal decision, a California federal judge has ruled in favour of cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase, allowing it to proceed with the planned delisting of Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC).

    The ruling, delivered by Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín of the US District Court for the Northern District of California, came after a contentious legal battle initiated by BiT Global, a digital asset custodian partly owned by Tron founder Justin Sun.

    The BiT Global lawsuit against Coinbase for WBTC delisting

    The dispute began in November 2024 when Coinbase announced its intention to delist WBTC, citing concerns over its association with Justin Sun.

    Sun, a controversial figure in the crypto space, has faced allegations of fraud and market manipulation.

    BiT Global responded by filing a $1 billion lawsuit against Coinbase on antitrust grounds, seeking a temporary restraining order (TRO) to halt the delisting. The firm argued that the move would destabilize WBTC’s market and cause substantial financial harm to investors.

    Temporary restraining order (TRO) declined

    During a virtual hearing on December 18, Judge Martínez-Olguín denied BiT Global’s request for a TRO, ruling that the company failed to provide sufficient evidence of imminent and irreparable harm. She noted that BiT Global’s delay in filing the lawsuit after Coinbase’s initial announcement weakened its case.

    In its defence, Coinbase pointed to BiT Global’s refusal to disclose ownership details and concerns about Sun’s influence over the token’s integrity.

    While the court left open the possibility for BiT Global to present stronger evidence in the future, the decision effectively cleared the path for Coinbase to delist WBTC as planned on December 19.

    Notably, WBTC’s delisting comes amid Coinbase’s recent launch of its own wrapped bitcoin token, cbBTC, raising questions about competitive motives.

    Despite the controversy, WBTC continues to dominate the wrapped bitcoin market, holding 85% of the Ethereum network’s market share.

    Source link

  • UK High Court Judge rules against Craig Wright over Bitcoin copyright claims

    UK High Court Judge rules against Craig Wright over Bitcoin copyright claims

    UK High Court rules against Craig Wright over Bitcoin (BTC) copyright claims

    The UK High Court has delivered a damning verdict against Craig Wright, a controversial figure claiming to be the elusive creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto.

    Judge James Mellor, in a written judgment, asserted that Wright had lied “extensively and repeatedly” throughout the trial, further accusing him of presenting “fabricated” evidence to support his claims.

    COPA wins against Craig Wright

    Judge Mellor’s ruling serves as a culmination of a protracted legal battle that has spanned several years.

    The lawsuit, brought forth by the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), aimed to challenge Craig Wright’s assertions of ownership over the intellectual rights to Bitcoin’s code and whitepaper.

    Wright’s purported attempts to lay claim to these foundational aspects of the cryptocurrency ecosystem have been met with scepticism and legal resistance from various quarters.

    Wright’s litigious nature, characterized by numerous lawsuits against developers and individuals critical of his claims, has raised concerns within the Bitcoin community.

    However, Mellor acknowledged the adverse impact of Wright’s aggressive legal strategy on Bitcoin developers, stating that Satoshi Nakamoto, known for a collaborative and non-confrontational approach, would unlikely resort to litigation.

    Fabrications and forgeries of documents

    The judgment highlighted Wright’s alleged fabrications and forgeries of documents on a significant scale, all in support of his central claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto.

    The judge characterized Wright’s actions as “clumsy” and underscored the pivotal role these falsehoods played in shaping the trial’s outcome.

    COPA, formed with the primary objective of defending the open nature of the cryptocurrency ecosystem, contested Wright’s assertions, arguing that such claims could stifle innovation and deter developers from contributing to the Bitcoin network.

    Throughout the trial, evidence emerged casting doubt on the authenticity of Wright’s claims.

    Documents submitted by Wright’s defence purportedly supporting his identity as Satoshi Nakamoto were scrutinized, revealing inconsistencies and anomalies.

    Fonts that did not exist at the alleged time of their creation and metadata indicating recent document alterations were among the discrepancies cited in Judge Mellor’s judgment.

    Perjury charges loom over Craig Wright

    The legal saga surrounding Craig Wright has been closely monitored by the cryptocurrency community, given its potential ramifications for the future of Bitcoin and the broader blockchain space.

    While Craig Wright has announced on X that he will be appealing the ruling, the ruling represents a significant setback for his ambitions, with the possibility of perjury charges looming over him.

    In response to the verdict, COPA hailed the decision as a victory for open innovation and the principles upon which Bitcoin was founded.

    The alliance reiterated its commitment to safeguarding the decentralized nature of the cryptocurrency ecosystem, vowing to continue its efforts to protect against unwarranted copyright claims.

    As the dust settles on this legal showdown, the broader implications of Judge Mellor’s ruling reverberate across the cryptocurrency landscape.

    The verdict not only underscores the importance of transparency and integrity within the community but also serves as a cautionary tale against attempts to monopolize or control foundational elements of decentralized technologies like Bitcoin.



    Source link