Tag: sale

  • Michael Saylor’s Strategy upsizes ‘stretch’ preferred stock sale to $2.8 billion

    Michael Saylor’s Strategy upsizes ‘stretch’ preferred stock sale to $2.8 billion

    Michael Saylor's Strategy upsizes 'stretch' preferred stock sale to $2.8 billion

    • Michael Saylor’s Strategy launched and upsized a new preferred stock offering from $500M to $2.8 billion.
    • The ‘Stretch’ security promises a hefty 9% annual payout with no end date and a flexible, adjustable dividend.
    • The deal is the latest in Saylor’s years-long effort to transform Strategy into a financial vehicle to acquire Bitcoin.

    Michael Saylor’s relentless quest to transform his company, Strategy, into a Bitcoin-acquiring financial juggernaut has reached a new level of ambition.

    The firm has launched and then promptly upsized a novel preferred stock offering, raising a staggering $2.8 billion in a deal that further showcases Saylor’s prowess in the capital markets and the insatiable investor appetite for exposure to the booming crypto market.

    As crypto prices continue their upward march, Saylor’s Bitcoin holding company, Strategy, has once again demonstrated its unique ability to tap into market enthusiasm.

    The company priced a new kind of security on Thursday, which it has dubbed “Stretch.” This offering promises buyers a hefty 9% annual payout with no specified end date, an unusual feature in the often-arcane world of preferred stock.

    Initially planned as a $500 million deal, the offering was upsized to $2.8 billion due to overwhelming demand, according to a person familiar with the transaction who asked to remain anonymous.

    This move is the latest, and perhaps most audacious, demonstration of Saylor’s Wall Street wizardry in his years-long effort to pivot a middling software firm, formerly known as MicroStrategy, into a corporate entity singularly obsessed with one goal: raising as much money as possible to acquire as many Bitcoin as possible.

    At last count, the company’s hoard stood at some 600,000 coins, worth approximately $70 billion.

    “This is not the first financial engineering initiative by Strategy,” noted Campbell Harvey, a professor at Duke University. “In any situation where your company is worth far more than fundamental value, you raise money.”

    Since Strategy’s first groundbreaking Bitcoin purchase in 2020, Saylor has employed a diverse range of financial instruments, including selling equity, issuing various types of debt, and layering multiple stacks of preferred shares.

    In doing so, he has not only amassed a colossal Bitcoin treasury but has also inspired a fleet of imitators, spurring a new industry of public companies dedicated to the so-called “treasury strategy” of buying and holding cryptocurrencies.

    The ‘Stretch’ security: a new twist on an old theme

    Many of the previous financial instruments that have fueled Strategy’s rise have proven to be more popular than expected, but even against that backdrop, the demand for “Stretch” was notable.

    The company’s common shares rose 0.5% on Wednesday and are up an impressive 43% for the year.

    The new “Stretch” shares occupy a specific place in Strategy’s complex and unusual capital structure.

    They sit above the company’s common stock and its other preferred shares—which carry creative names like “Strike” and “Stride”—but remain subordinate to its convertible bonds and another preferred stock known as “Strife.”

    A key feature that distinguishes “Stretch” from earlier offerings is its flexible dividend. Unlike a fixed payout, this security allows Strategy to tweak the dividend rate.

    Each month, the firm will set a new payout rate with the aim of keeping the share price near the $100 mark, raising or lowering the dividend as needed to maintain this target. It’s a unique combination of a dynamic pricing model and a trust exercise, and a clear reminder that in the world of financial engineering, Strategy often creates its own rules.

    Diminishing returns? A discount to win over investors

    While this flexibility may appeal to Saylor’s large and dedicated fan base of retail investors, it also introduces a new layer of uncertainty into an already complex capital structure.

    There are some signs that Saylor’s tactics may be facing somewhat diminishing returns, as the value of the company, relative to the Bitcoin it owns, has reportedly gone down.

    In a move to win over investors for its latest offering, Strategy offered the “Stretch” shares at a discount. The shares, which are set to carry an initial dividend of 9%, were sold for $90 each.

    This was at the bottom of the marketed range and represents a discount to their face value of $100, according to the person familiar with the deal.

    Despite the discount, the outsized demand for the deal provides the latest and most powerful sign of both Saylor’s avid following and the continued speculative fervor that is running through the financial markets.

    According to a previous Bloomberg report, major financial institutions including Morgan Stanley, Barclays Plc, Moelis & Co., and TD Securities worked on this landmark deal.

    Source link

  • Celsius vs Tether lawsuit moves ahead in US court over $4 billion Bitcoin sale

    Celsius vs Tether lawsuit moves ahead in US court over $4 billion Bitcoin sale

    Celsius vs Tether lawsuit moves ahead in US court over $4 billion Bitcoin sale

    • Celsius claims Tether’s 2022 Bitcoin sale broke contract terms.
    • Over 39,500 BTC were liquidated at $20,656 average price.
    • Claims include breach of contract and fraudulent transfer.

    Celsius Network’s efforts to hold Tether accountable for a $4 billion Bitcoin liquidation just cleared a major hurdle in US court.

    A bankruptcy judge has now allowed Celsius to proceed with legal action against Tether, despite the stablecoin giant’s attempts to halt the case on jurisdictional grounds.

    The lawsuit centres on claims that Tether prematurely and unfairly sold nearly 40,000 BTC during Celsius’s collapse in mid-2022, in breach of a contractual agreement and US bankruptcy laws.

    The ruling could mark a turning point for how global crypto firms are treated in American courts, especially when assets are involved that were managed, sold, or transferred through US-linked systems.

    While the court dismissed some peripheral allegations, it upheld key claims, including breach of contract and fraudulent transfer, allowing Celsius’s case to continue.

    Celsius accuses Tether of early Bitcoin liquidation breach

    The dispute dates back to June 2022, when Celsius was already reeling from the broader crypto market crash. Court filings reveal that Tether had lent money to Celsius and, in return, received collateral in Bitcoin.

    Celsius now alleges that Tether liquidated 39,500 BTC at an average price of $20,656 without providing the contractually required 10-hour notice period.

    The assets, according to Celsius, were liquidated during a time of extreme market volatility, and sold significantly below market value. Celsius claims the early sale resulted in a loss of over $4 billion based on current Bitcoin prices.

    Moreover, the company alleges that Tether later transferred the liquidated BTC to Bitfinex, a platform operated by Tether’s sister company, raising concerns around related-party dealings and asset custody.

    US court rejects Tether’s jurisdictional challenge

    In its defence, Tether had argued that the case should be thrown out because it operates from the British Virgin Islands and Hong Kong. The company said US courts had no jurisdiction over its business.

    However, the judge disagreed, pointing to the fact that Tether used US-based staff, bank accounts, and communication systems in its dealings with Celsius.

    The court ruled that Tether’s actions were sufficiently “domestic” to fall under US legal scrutiny.

    This decision now paves the way for Celsius to pursue several key legal charges including breach of contract, fraudulent transfer, and preferential treatment of certain creditors—allegations that strike at the core of how digital asset lenders and stablecoin issuers operate.

    Broader implications for crypto lending and stablecoin governance

    Legal experts say the outcome of this case could influence the regulatory treatment of stablecoin issuers, particularly in the US.

    If Celsius is able to demonstrate that Tether mismanaged client assets or failed to honour notice periods during market stress, it may prompt calls for stricter oversight on asset liquidation procedures, especially for offshore firms operating through US financial infrastructure.

    The case may also set a precedent for future cross-border lending disputes and clarify whether offshore crypto companies can be held accountable in US bankruptcy proceedings.

    The outcome could therefore impact how other large digital asset firms manage collateral and liquidity risk during market downturns.

    Tether grows market presence amid legal scrutiny

    Despite the ongoing legal challenges, Tether has continued to expand its footprint in the crypto sector. The company recently acquired a majority stake in Twenty One Capital, a firm associated with Strike CEO Jack Mallers.

    This move connects Tether to the third-largest corporate Bitcoin holder globally.

    In another significant development, Tether transferred around 37,230 BTC—currently worth $3.9 billion—to addresses associated with its trading operations.

    The company appears to be consolidating its Bitcoin reserves even as it navigates the legal fallout from the Celsius collapse.

    Meanwhile, speculation continues over Tether’s valuation and a possible initial public offering.

    However, CEO Paolo Ardoino has denied any plans for a public listing, stating that the firm is not preparing for an IPO despite rumoured valuations nearing $500 billion.

    As the Celsius case moves into the next phase, attention will remain on how Tether responds to mounting legal pressure in one of the largest financial disputes in crypto history.

    Source link